ESOS: A plea for pragmatism

September 7, 2015

With thousands of companies likely to miss the deadline of 5 December, Darryl Mattocks, ESOS lead assessor and Managing Director of energy management consultancy, Enistic, is calling for the Environment Agency to be lenient on the thousands of companies likely to miss the deadline.

With less than three months left until we reach the ESOS compliance deadline, the latest figures from the Environment Agency indicate that a mere 2% of companies have achieved sign-off to date.  Leaving the vast majority of around 10,000* organisations covered by the scheme still working on their ESOS evidence packs as we hurtle relentlessly towards the deadline of 5 December.  Realistically, I feel that it is now clear that a high percentage of businesses will fail to obtain sign-off in time.

That is if they have actually started working on ESOS – or even know about it.  The most recent research published by the Environment Agency back in July indicated that 22% of organisations were still unaware of the scheme, of those that did only 56% had actually made a start. However, the Environment Agency is confident that “awareness is high;” and that a lot of people know about and are working on ESOS, a spokesman told us: “Our experience is that in the last few weeks 50% of total submissions are made in that space of time.”

We have been working with many companies on compliance since the initiative was first announced, and every day we receive calls from many more just embarking on the work and needing help.  We have expanded our team to cope with the demand, but for those yet to yet make a start (of which there’s a significant number) they are unlikely to meet the deadline.

Generally, the nature of the large businesses covered by the scheme means that, with so much to do, a huge amount of data to collate across complex operations and with layers of management approvals, they are rarely agile enough to spring into action with the necessary speed to meet ESOS obligations..

The Environment Agency has made it clear that “There can be no extension to the deadline” which is in the Regulations.  Quizzed on the number of companies likely to miss the deadline, the Agency told us that “It is too early to tell.  We can’t say numbers.  It is still difficult, even with 3 months to go.

This is all very well. But, arguably there was a miscalculation in the time it would take to get the message out and the job done effectively.

And what happens if – when – so many businesses do fail to comply by the 5 December? These companies could face heavy penalties including substantial fines of up to £90,000.

Either late this or early next month, the Environment Agency is due to publish its enforcement and sanctions guidance.  If stringently applied as they stand, the administrative nightmare of sending out penalty notices and collecting fines will cost a fortune and crush goodwill.

Much better for the Environment Agency to take the initiative with pragmatism and common sense.  Hold fire on heavy fines and allow those organisations which have demonstrably made progress on their audits and ESOS evidence pack time to finish the job and to do it well without major penalties

If we want to get business behind the scheme and take the potential energy savings opportunities seriously, it is important that they do more than simply go through the motions.  With time as the main driver, we are at risk of losing out on the main objective of the legislation as saving energy becomes a casualty of the last-minute scrabble to deadline and we get a ‘tick the box’ rather than a determined exercise.

I urge the Environment Agency to take care in how it sets out the penalties.

Darryl Mattocks is Managing Director of Enistic which is still able to take on new ESOS clients for the time being. Organisations needing a lead assessor or help in achieving compliance can contact the company by phone on 0844 875 1600 or email [email protected], see wordpress-1115181-4362448.cloudwaysapps.com for more details.

 

* The Environment Agency sent out 14,000 letters to ensure all large organisations and their subsidiaries were informed.  The estimated number of businesses which need comply with ESOS is 10,000.

Book a demo

Talk to our team to:

  • Explore how Enistic is effectively used by companies to track, analyse, and report their carbon emissions.
  • Discover seamless methods for data gathering and integrating Enistic into your team's daily workflow with minimal disruption.
  • Seek custom solutions and receive tailored support.
  • Explore pricing options suitable for your company and your needs.

Our Latest Blog Posts

Why Waiting on PPN 006 Could Cost You NHS Contracts

If your organisation bids for NHS contracts, 2026 is the year to act on carbon reporting. From April 2027, the requirements under PPN 006 are expanding significantly. The businesses that wait until the deadline will find themselves under real compliance and resource...

UK SRS S1 and S2 Finalised: Preparing for the 2027 Transition

Last month, the UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS) were formally published by the UK government, marking a significant milestone in the evolution of corporate sustainability reporting. Although sustainability disclosures have been developing for several...

Why Product Carbon Footprints are Becoming Essential in 2026

From 2026 onwards, buyers, regulators and investors are asking a more direct question about sustainability. Not just how much carbon your organisation emits, but how much carbon do each of your products emit. Organisational carbon footprints are no longer enough....

Defining Good Carbon Reporting: What Our Clients Are Doing Right

There is no single definition of strong progress. It is shaped by sector, regulatory pressure, organisational complexity and commercial priorities. A manufacturer responding to customer requests will look very different from that of a public sector supplier navigating...

CCAs: The Smart Route to Lower Costs and Lower Carbon

For years, many businesses only considered Climate Change Agreements as a mechanism for reducing the cost of the Climate Change Levy. As the UK moves further into its net-zero transition, Climate Change Agreements (CCAs) are shifting from simple tax relief instruments...

What PPN 006 Means for NHS Suppliers in 2026

From 2026, PPN 006 will play an increasingly important role in how sustainability, carbon reduction, and supplier accountability are assessed across NHS procurement. PPN 006, although presented as a procurement policy notice, represents a wider shift in how the NHS...

Digital Product Passports

From 2026, Digital Product Passports (DPPs) are set to transform how sustainability, transparency, and product responsibility are managed across Europe. DPPs are not just another regulation to tick off your checklist. It is a fundamental shift in how product...

Compliance Changes Coming in 2026

2026 marks the turning point for EU sustainability regulation. For businesses operating in, exporting to, or supplying the EU market, the next 12-24 months are a key preparation window. Early action lowers future compliance costs, strengthens data quality, and...

The True Carbon Use of AI – Why the Numbers May Surprise You

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently emerged as a focal point in global sustainability discussions. The narrative frequently leans towards disaster, with headlines claiming AI will drain national power grids or exacerbate water scarcity in regions hosting data...

Smarter Savings: How Enistic AI Estimates Energy, Carbon and Cost Savings

Selecting the right energy-saving project is often far more complex than it first appears. Organisations face an overwhelming list of options, each with their different costs, operational implications, and expected savings. Without solid data, it can be extremely...
Loading...